Search Results

Keyword: ‘simple robot base’

Build a simple robot base (Update)

September 29th, 2009 No comments

An update from my earlier post:

My students have gotten the first of the simple robot bases up and moving. A Wytech Fox11 board and a Solarbotics L298 Compact Motor Driver (H-Bridge) have been added to the bot base, along with the batteries and power distribution (fuse, switches, etc).





Categories: Robot Projects Tags:

Build a simple robot base

August 3rd, 2009 No comments

Materials needed:

1/4″ hardwood (plywood) board cut into 12″ squares
1/16″ x 1′ x 3′ Aluminum Angle (cut into 1 ft lengths)
1/4″-20X12″ Threaded rod (4 pieces)
1″x2″x12″ wood (2 pieces)
Closet Door Ball Catch (Solid Brass Co N-7287 or Similar) (x2)
2 Motors (see
10-24 machine screws (for mounting motor)
Nuts and Washers for #20 rod (above)


* – All items above purchased a Home Depot except were noted. They should also be available from LOWES or any good hardware store.

I am NOT a woodworker or mechanically inclined, if you are you will probably want to measure everything and drill one piece at a time. If you are like me I would suggest you stack the two 1/4″ plywood pieces, the Aluminum Angle and the 1″x2″ and drill them all at once, then put a threaded rod though the hole and move to the next hole to be drilled (see below):


Next, drill the bottom piece of plywood for the Closet Door Ball Catch which are used as front and back casters. I drilled a 13/16″ hole 2 inches from the front and back centered on the plywood board.




You will need to adjust the spring tension on the ball so it will act like a caster. This can be done by turning the white plastic on the back. The height can be adjusted by turning the entire assembly in its mounting bracket. You want it so the robot’s motorized drive wheels make good contact, but the robot does not teeter when starting or stopping.

Then you will need to mark and drill the Aluminum Angle for the two holes needed to mount the motors. I suggest using making tape on the motors, then mark the holes and the center of the drive shaft on the tape, then put the tape on the Aluminum Angle, making sure the drive shaft center is at the 6″ mark on the Aluminum Angle, and drill.



You can transfer the holes to the second Aluminum Angle by placing the two back to back and using the already drilled piece as a guide.



Once it is all drilled, start with the the bottom placing the bottom plywood, Aluminum angle and then the 1″x2″ board down. Put a nut, lockwasher and washer on the threaded rod, put though the 1″x2″ board, Aluminum angle and the plywood then secure with a washer, lockwasher and nut. Do this on all 4 corners. Then do the same for the top plywood.


(note, lock washers NOT shown here)

The final robot will look like:


This base (and two more just like it) were built for use in my Computer Interfacing class at the University of Memphis. I plan to use an H-Bridge circuit, 68HC11 development board (FOX-11), and add Sonar, Line Track, IR Distance and other sensors to the robot for various assignments in the class.

For more pictures goto

PS Thanks to Wesley Harris for doing most of the assembly of the bots!

Categories: Robot Projects Tags:

5 Challenges We Need to Solve for Home Robots

January 20th, 2016 No comments

Let’s Bring Rosie Home: 5 Challenges We Need to Solve for Home Robots
From IEEE Spectrum
By Shahin Farshchi
Posted 13 Jan 2016 | 16:25 GMT


Science fiction authors love the robot sidekick. R2-D2, Commander Data, and KITT—just to name a few—defined “Star Wars,” “Star Trek,” and “Knight Rider,” respectively, just as much as their human actors. While science has brought us many of the inventions dreamed of in sci-fi shows, one major human activity has remained low tech and a huge source of frustration: household chores. Why can’t we have more robots helping us with our domestic tasks? That’s a question that many roboticists and investors (myself included) have long been asking ourselves. Recently, we’ve seen some promising developments in the home robotics space, including Jibo’s successful financing and SoftBank’s introduction of Pepper. Still, a capable, affordable robotic helper—like Rosie, the robot maid from “The Jetsons”—remains a big technical and commercial challenge. Should robot makers focus on designs that are extensions of our smartphones (as Jibo seems to be doing), or do we need a clean-sheet approach towards building these elusive bots?

Take a look at the machines in your home. If you remove the bells and whistles, home automation hasn’t dramatically changed since the post–World War II era. Appliances, such as washing machines, dishwashers, and air conditioners, seemed magical after WWII. Comprised primarily of pumps, motors, and plumbing, they were simply extensions of innovations that came to bear during the industrial revolution. It probably doesn’t come as a surprise that industrial behemoths such as GE, Westinghouse, and AEG (now Electrolux) shepherded miniature versions of the machines used in factories into suburban homes. At the time, putting dirty clothes and dishes into a box from which they emerged clean was rather remarkable. To this day, the fundamental experience remains the same, with improvements revolving around reliability, and efficiency. Features enabled by Internet-of-Things technologies are marginal at best, i.e., being able to log into your refrigerator or thermostat through your phone.

But before wondering when we’ll have home robots, it might be fair to ask: Do we even need them? Consider what you can already do just by tapping on your phone, thanks to a host of on-demand service startups. Instacart brings home the groceries; Handy and Super send professionals to fix or clean your home; Pager brings primary care, while HomeTeam does elderly care. (Disclosure: my company, Lux Capital, is an investor in Super, Pager, and HomeTeam.) So, again, why do we need robots to perform these services when humans seem to be doing them just fine? I don’t think anyone has a compelling answer to that question today, and home robots will probably evolve and transform themselves over and over until they find their way into our homes. Indeed, it took decades of automobiles until the Model T was born. The Apple IIs and PC clones of the early 1980s had difficulty justifying their lofty price tags to anyone who wasn’t wealthy, or a programmer. We need to expect the same from our first home bots.

So it might be helpful to examine what problems engineers need to crack before they can attempt to build something like Rosie the robot. Below I discuss five areas that I believe need significant advances if we want to move the whole home robot field forward.

1. We Need Machine-Human Interfaces

Siri and Amazon’s Alexa demonstrate how far speech recognition and natural language processing have come. Unfortunately, they are no more than a human-machine interface, designed to displace the keyboard and mouse. What we need is a machine-human interface. Where is the distinction? It starts with understanding people, rather than aggregating data and using statistical patterns to make inferences. It can understand our moods and emotional contexts, as an artificial intelligence would. Humans do not interact with one another through a series of commands (well, maybe some do); they establish a connection, and once a computer can take on that role, then we have a true machine-human interface. Scientists are starting to tackle this by applying concepts used in programming toward establishing rules for robot-human conversations, but we’ll need much more if we want to have engaging AI assistants like the one in the movie “Her.” ​

2. Cheap Sensors Need to Get Cheaper

Driverless cars will generate hard cash for their operators, so forking over thousands for an array of lidar, radar, ultrasound, and cameras is a no-brainer. Home robots, however, may need to fit the ever-discretionary consumer budget. The array of sensors the robot would need to properly perceive its environment could render it cost prohibitive unless the sensors cost pennies as they do in mobile phones. MEMS technology dramatically lowered the cost of inertial sensors, which previously cost thousands of dollars and were relegated to aircraft and spacecraft. Can computer vision applied to an array of cheap cameras and infrared sensors provide adequate sensing capability? And can we expect lidar to come down in price, or do we need a whole new sensing technology? A startup called Dual Aperture has added a second aperture for infrared hence creating the ability to infer short distances. Meanwhile, DARPA is funding the research on chip-based lidar, and Quanergy expects to launch a solid-state optical phased array, thereby eliminating the mechanical components that raise the cost of lidar. We expect engineers to find creative ways to reduce the cost of existing sensing technology, while obviating others altogether, and hopefully making them as cheap as sensors in our phones today.

3. Manipulators Need to Get a Grip

Loose objects find their way into our homes because they are easy to manipulate with our hands. If we expect a robot to be able to clean and organize these objects as efficiently as humans do, it needs manipulators that are at least as effective as the human hand. Companies such as Robotiq, Right Hand Robotics, and Soft Robotics, among others, have designed efficient and reliable manipulators. Though air-powered inflatable grippers have the advantage of being soft and lightweight, they do require a pump, which is not very practical for a mobile robot. Efforts funded by DARPA at iRobot, SRI, and other labs and companies seem to be taking us in the right direction, helping robots get a grip.

4. Robots Need to Handle Arbitrary Objects

Opening doors, flipping switches, and cleaning up scattered toys are simple tasks for us humans, but compute-intense for machines today. A robot like Roomba performs two tasks: running a suction motor and generating a path along what’s expected to be a flat surface with rigid obstacles. How about washing dishes or folding laundry? These tasks require a suite of capabilities ranging from recognizing objects, identifying grasping points, understanding how an object will interact with other objects, and even predicting the consequences of being wrong. DARPA, NSF, NASA, and European Union science funding agencies are sponsoring much-needed research in this area, but “solving manipulation” will probably require leveraging a number of different technologies, including cloud robotics and deep learning.

5. Navigating Unstructured Environments Needs to Become Routine

Anyone who saw this year’s DARPA Robotics Challenge would appreciate how difficult of a problem it is to navigate and manipulate an unstructured, unknown environment. Those robots were slow. Though driverless cars pose a formidable challenge, it has been proven to be more tractable. Deep learning techniques can help robots recognize soft objects vs. hard obstructions, and human assistants may be able to “teach” robots until the algorithms take over. Like the manipulation problem, real-time navigation requires robots to quickly sense, perceive, and execute—probably several orders of magnitude faster that they DRC winning team is today. Full autonomy won’t happen overnight, but that isn’t a problem: humans can help robots get out of a bind. Willow Garage was a pioneer with its Heaphy Project, where assistance to robots is crowdsourced to remote operators. More robotics and industrial automation companies are embracing the notion of humans overseeing robots, with the expectation of going from the (superfluous) 1:1 human-robot ratio to a single operator being able to oversee/assist many robots.

Shahin Farshchi is a partner at Lux Capital, where he invests in hardware and robotics companies. Follow him on Twitter:@farshchi

Categories: IEEE, Robot News Tags:

10 Popular Robot Toys for Christmas 2015

December 18th, 2015 No comments

Looking for the perfect robot toy for your child? Here are the hottest robot toys for the 2015 Christmas season that are entertaining and educational.

By Steve Crowe

Are you struggling to find the perfect gift for the techie on your holiday shopping list? We’ve selected our pick of the best robot toys that are likely to have a fun, educational impact due to their cutting-edge features.

Whether you are looking for a toy that provides a pure fun factor, a toy that can teach logic and programming or a toy that could be a companion, these robot toys are sure to
be the perfect fit for people of all ages. We’d love to own every robot on the list, and you should too.

Sphero Star Wars BB-8 Droid

The Star Wars BB-8 app-enabled Droid ($150) has an adaptive personality that changes as you play. Set it to patrol and watch your Droid explore autonomously, make up your own adventure and guide BB-8 yourself, or create and view holographic videos.

The BB-8, which is built by Sphero, can be controlled via smartphone or table and it responds to your voice.

Anki OverDrive Robot Racecars

Anki Overdrive ($150 for Starter Kit) is the second-generation of the popular robot racecars, debuting new cars, apps, new gameplay features and a new modular track system that lets users create custom racetracks.

It also is the first time the product series allows iOS and Android users to battle eachother can now for the first time battle each other.

A new modular track system allows you to clip together track pieces by connecting magnets. The Anki Overdrive kit comes with 10 track pieces that allow you to create eight tracks.

Ozobot Bit 2.0

One of the world’s smallest programmable robot toys, Ozobot 2.0 Bit ($69.95) is designed to teach kids how to program with an intuitive color-based programming language.Ozobot Bit can sense colored lines, detect patterns such as intersections, read flashing light codes, and execute a total of 500 commands.

Ozobot Bit is basically identical to the original Ozobot, offering all the same capabilities, but it adds in Google’s Blockly coding editor. The idea is to have kids expand their coding know-how and see the results unfold in front of them in near real-time.

The programming is done on a mobile device, either iOS or Android. Once the coding is complete, just put Ozobot Bit on the corresponding surface and hit a button and the Ozobot app will immediately communicate the commands to the robot


Cubelets ($160) are robot blocks that make it fast and easy to engage children as young as four in learning by building robots. You don’t need to know anything about coding, all you do is snap the robot blocks together and the magnetic faces do the rest.

Perhaps the best part is the included Brick Adapters connect to your favorite brick-based construction systems such as Lego.

Dash & Dot

Dash & Dot ($200) interact with the world using sensors. They can hear sounds, detect objects, and know if you are moving them. They can be programmed to do anything you can imagine using a simple visual programming language called Blockly -Deliver a message to a friend, have a dance party, and even navigate through an obstacle course.

WowWee MiPosaur Robot Dinosaur

The MiPosaur is one of WowWee’s many popular robot toys. Miposaur ($119 on Amazon) is a robotic creature with evolving intelligence and personality that can sense its environment.

It comes with gesture control technology that allows you to control it with the swipe of your hand. Move your hand side to side to make MiPosaur dance or cover its eyes.

MiPosaur comes with an interactive TrackBall that it plays with, using it to activate Feed, Chase and Guard modes. MiPosaur, compatible with both iOS and android smart devices, is fully interactive with the MiP robot and a BLE enabled app. Look for MiPosaur in the third quarter of 2015 for $120.

Hasbro Robot Cat

Hasbro’s $99 Companion Pet Cat is available in three colors and has motion and light sensors to respond to touch. It even has “VibraPurr” technology to replicate a “realistic cat purr.” The Companion Pet Cat has sensors in its back, belly, cheek and head.

Sphero Ollie

Ollie ($99) is one of Sphero’s older robot toys, but it’s still loads of fun. Controlled via iOS or Android devices, Ollie can spin, drift, turn, flip and tumble over courses that you deigned. You can create custom trick combinations and design multiplayer games with friends.

Ollie is protected by a durable polycarbonate shell and outfitted with glowing LED’s, so it’s ready to take on any terrain day or night. It connects to iOS or Android devices via Bluetooth LE and is powered by USB charging.

OWI 3 in 1
The 3-in-1 All Terrain Robot ($60) is a multi-function tracked mobile robotics kit that kids build themselves. Use different track modules and make your robot transform into three variations: the forklift, rover and gripper.

In forklift mode, the ATR is like a mini industrial fork lift, with the ability to lift up to 100 g in weight. In rover mode, the ATR’s tank-like treads can traverse any type of surface. And in gripper mode, the ATR’s strong arms grab and pull objects into its grasp, lifting anything up to 100g and moving it to your desired location.

The Hexbug Battle Spider is a micro robotic spider for children ages 8 and up that measures 4 x 4 x 3 inches and only weighs four ounces.

Although referred to as a spider, the Hexbug only has six legs that allow it to move in any direction. Its head can rotate 360 degrees, and it uses an LED light as an eye so you know where it is facing.

It “shoots” LED light beams and an invisble infrared light. You’ll need two Hexbugs ($66) to engage in a battle. Each Hexbug can be hit with the light and after 10 hits it will shut down and needs to be restarted.

Categories: Robot News Tags:

A Thousand-Robot Swarm

August 19th, 2014 No comments

from IEEE Spectrum [click for full article]


When Harvard researchers first introduced their Kilobot project in 2011, they had built only 25 of the little robots. Two years later, they announced that they had made 100 robots. Now the researchers say they have built one thousand Kilobots—possibly the most robots that have ever been operating in the same place at the same time. The Harvard team is now teaching the robots to behave like a swarm, organizing and controlling themselves based on a set of simple rules, much like in biological systems. Learn how each Kilobot works and watch a video of the swarm forming different shapes.

Categories: IEEE, Robot News Tags:

Every Kid Needs One of These DIY Robotics Kits

July 24th, 2012 No comments

From IEEE Spectrum
Posted by Evan Ackerman
Wen July 11, 2012

Robots are intimidating, and starting from scratch with them is hard, no matter what age you are. You usually have to learn both hardware and software at the same time to get a robot to do anything cool, and for people without a background in either of these things, surmounting that initial learning curve can be scary. BirdBrain Technologies, a spinoff from Carnegie Mellon’s Robotics Institute, has just released a new DIY kit called Hummingbird that promises to make building a robot as easy (and affordable) as possible.

As you’d expect, the Hummingbird kit involves both a hardware component and a software component. Let’s take a look at the hardware first:

We really like the fact that everything’s included here, with a clearly marked board and color coded wiring. It’s also nifty that the wires just snap in and out, no soldering required, although (to be honest) soldering is not that hard and building simple robots is a great excuse to learn how. But you know, for kids (or clumsy adults), soldering might not always be the safest way to go.

On the software side, the kit comes with a Java-based drag-and-drop visual programming interface that doesn’t require any previous experience at all, and anyone with a passing obsession with their iPhone should be able to get it working in no time. There’s a demo video here.

Now, although this is called a “kit,” it’s not like there’s instructions that tell you what to build. It’s the best kind of robot kit: the kind where you use your imagination and some creativity to build a robot of your very own. You might need some additional structural components (like cardboard), but beyond that, all it takes is a good idea to make whatever you want, which (in essence) is what’s so great about robots in general. Take a kit like this, come up with an idea, and make it real. Here’s just one example of what you can do:

The Hummingbird kit is intended for kids of ages 10 and up, although it’s not a bad way for people of any age to get familiar with getting hardware and software to work together. At $199 each, it might be a little more realistic to see the kit become part of an educational curriculum as opposed to something that kids will be able to buy for themselves, but if you’ve got a budding roboticist in your family who you’d like to foster, we’d say that this would be a pretty good investment.

To get one click HERE

Categories: Robot Parts, Teaching Technology Tags:

Lego Robot Link

February 25th, 2012 No comments

Was just told about a website for Lego NXT Robots that I just had to share.

Damien Kee has a wonderful site and also sells books/Curriculum for using NXT in the classroom.

My favorite is a simple to build NXT base (much easier to build than the one in the instruction book that comes with the NXT Education Kit). These building instructions are at:

Categories: Robot Projects, Teaching Technology Tags:

Perfect Robot Motors?

July 7th, 2009 No comments

Just purchased:


From MPJA.

According to a second seller the motor goes 1/2 speed at 12v. Seems to be a perfect motor for a very simple robot base. Time will tell…..

Categories: Robot Parts, Robot Projects Tags:

How It Works: How Servo Motors Work

December 19th, 2012 No comments

From: Jameco

How Servo Motors Work
This little motor-that-could is high in efficiency and power
By Frances Reed – Jameco Content Manager

Servo motors have been around for a long time and are utilized in many applications. They are small in size but pack a big punch and are very energy-efficient. Because of these features, they can be used to operate remote-controlled or radio-controlled toy cars, robots and airplanes. Servo motors are also used in industrial applications, robotics, in-line manufacturing, pharmaceutics and food services. But how do the little guys work?

The servo circuitry is built right inside the motor unit and has a positionable shaft, which usually is fitted with a gear (as shown below). The motor is controlled with an electric signal which determines the amount of movement of the shaft.

What’s inside the servo?
To fully understand how the servo works, you need to take a look under the hood. Inside there is a pretty simple set-up: a small DC motor, potentiometer, and a control circuit. The motor is attached by gears to the control wheel. As the motor rotates, the potentiometer’s resistance changes, so the control circuit can precisely regulate how much movement there is and in which direction.


When the shaft of the motor is at the desired position, power supplied to the motor is stopped. If not, the motor is turned in the appropriate direction. The desired position is sent via electrical pulses through the signal wire. The motor’s speed is proportional to the difference between its actual position and desired position. So if the motor is near the desired position, it will turn slowly, otherwise it will turn fast. This is called proportional control. This means the motor will only run as hard as necessary to accomplish the task at hand, a very efficient little guy.

How is the servo controlled?
Servos are controlled by sending an electrical pulse of variable width, or pulse width modulation (PWM), through the control wire. There is a minimum pulse, a maximum pulse, and a repetition rate. A servo motor can usually only turn 90 degrees in either direction for a total of 180 degree movement. The motor’s neutral position is defined as the position where the servo has the same amount of potential rotation in the both the clockwise or counter-clockwise direction. The PWM sent to the motor determines position of the shaft, and based on the duration of the pulse sent via the control wire; the rotor will turn to the desired position. The servo motor expects to see a pulse every 20 milliseconds (ms) and the length of the pulse will determine how far the motor turns. For example, a 1.5ms pulse will make the motor turn to the 90-degree position. Shorter than 1.5ms moves it to 0 degrees, and any longer than 1.5ms will turn the servo to 180 degrees, as diagramed below:


When these servos are commanded to move, they will move to the position and hold that position. If an external force pushes against the servo while the servo is holding a position, the servo will resist from moving out of that position. The maximum amount of force the servo can exert is called the torque rating of the servo. Servos will not hold their position forever though; the position pulse must be repeated to instruct the servo to stay in position.

Types of Servo Motors
There are two types of servo motors – AC and DC. AC servo can handle higher current surges and tend to be used in industrial machinery. DC servos are not designed for high current surges and are usually better suited for smaller applications. Generally speaking, DC motors are less expensive than their AC counterparts. These are also servo motors that have been built specifically for continuous rotation, making it an easy way to get your robot moving. They feature two ball bearings on the output shaft for reduced friction and easy access to the rest-point adjustment potentiometer.

Servo Motor Applications
Servos are used in radio-controlled airplanes to position control surfaces like elevators, rudders, walking a robot, or operating grippers. Servo motors are small, have built-in control circuitry and have good power for their size.

In food services and pharmaceuticals, the tools are designed to be used in harsher environments, where the potential for corrosion is high due to being washed at high pressures and temperatures repeatedly to maintain strict hygiene standards. Servos are also used in in-line manufacturing, where high repetition yet precise work is necessary.

Of course, you don’t have to know how a servo works to use one, but as with most electronics, the more you understand, the more doors open for expanded projects and projects’ capabilities. Whether you’re a hobbyist building robots, an engineer designing industrial systems, or just constantly curious, where will servo motors take you?

Seattle Robotics Society
AI Shack Blog
Jameco Workshop

Categories: Robot Parts, Teaching Technology Tags:

Results Of The MoonBots Challenge Announced

September 2nd, 2010 No comments

From: Wired Magazine

Results Of The MoonBots Challenge Announced — Houston, We Have A Winner!

After months of competing, the first MoonBots Challenge has come to a close with Team Landroids, a group from Livingston, New Jersey taking first place. The team is made up for five eighth-grade neighborhood friends named Karlin, Stanley, Brian, Gage and Jeffrey. The Landroids were captained by a dad: John Yeh. The winning team’s members are veterans of FIRST Lego League and are no strangers to science and robotic competitions. You can learn more about the Landroids and the protoypes they worked through by watching their documentary or visiting their Web site.

While the Landroids’ final run for the points makes the competition look easy (watch their video after the jump), it was anything but simple. All of their plans were nearly dashed as problem after problem popped up for the Landroids. But in the end, all was good and the Landroids emerged victoriuous.

Master Lego robot builder and MoonBots judge, Steve Hassenplug, talked about what set Team Landroids apart from the others. “I am very impressed with the results from all the finalists. Clearly all the teams worked hard and had a great deal of fun, but it appeared Landroids approached the competition with a level of professionalism unmatched by any other team, and they truly earned first place. I enjoyed the opportunity to judge the excellent work the teams did. They were all very impressive.”

Also recognized were the Shadowed Craters, who captured second place, and Team Moonwalk, which grabbed third. The Shadowed Craters were profiled here a couple weeks ago and are from the Miramar area of San Diego. Team Moonwalk is another New Jersey team (with part of the team hailing from Connecticut).

Anousheh Ansari, another MoonBots judge, commented on third place winners, Team Moonwalk: “Two things stood out for me in this team. One was because they used their technical knowledge to outline the scientific benefits of space exploration but also looked into the social benefits of space exploration and the opportunity for different nations to collaborate and create a lasting peace. This was one of my personal experiences on my flight to ISS. This collaborative aspect of space is what most people forget about.”

The long road to the finals began with more than 200 applications from around the globe, but mainly located in the United States. These teams were tasked with creating a documentary about their team, creating a prototype using Lego Digital Designer, Google Sketchup or LDraw and create a Web site to share information about their team.

From there, the field was narrowed down to 20 teams for Phase Two. (You can review the documentary entries from the top 20 teams who made it into Phase Two here and here.) These Phase Two teams were given Mindstorms kits and a set of objectives to complete within a three minute time period. Based on the team’s performance and some other criteria, a winner was chosen by a panel. Judges for this final phase included Anousheh Ansari, Steve Hassenplug, Dean Kamen and Jeff Kodosky.

“Congratulations to all of the MoonBots winners and finalists,” said Jeff Kodosky, Cofounder and NI Business and Technology Fellow at National Instruments. “NI is proud to join with all the other MoonBots sponsors and partners in this incredibly innovative challenge that will help advance science, technology, engineering and math education throughout the world.”

Team Landroids will enjoy the grand prize of a trip to Billund, Denmark to visit Lego headquarters, as well as a kit and registration for either FIRST Robotics FRC or FTC. The Shadowed Craters receive a 64GB iPod Touch for each team member and a kit and registration for FIRST competition. Team Moonwalk receives a kit and registration for a FIRST competition too.

Thanks to all teams who entered. Every team did a fantastic job, according to William Pomerantz, Senior Director of Space Prizes for the X Prize Foundation. “The work these students did this summer was truly spectacular. The mission very closely paralleled the work our Google Lunar X Prize teams were doing, so we greatly enjoyed watching those technical challenges worked out on a different scale. The new era of lunar exploration is being built on the contribution of people of all ages and nationalities, and it is clear that the MoonBots participants have what it takes to make important contributions.”

Categories: Robot News Tags: