DARPA Robotics Challenge: Here Are the Official Details

DARPA to the robotics community: the challenge is on.
IEEE Spectrum Online
POSTED BY: Erico Guizzo & Evan Ackerman
Tue, April 10, 2012

Today the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is announcing a bold new program aiming to advance robotics technology for disaster response. The DARPA Robotics Challenge is offering tens of million of dollars in funding to teams from anywhere in the world to build robots capable of performing complex mobility and manipulation tasks such as walking over rubble and operating power tools. It all will culminate with an audacious competition with robots driving trucks, breaking through walls, and attempting to perform repairs in a simulated industrial-disaster setting. The winner takes all: a $2 million cash prize.

Illustration of a disaster response scenario part of the DARPA Robotics Challenge: The robot on the right uses a power tool to break through a wall, and the one on the left turns a valve to close a leaking pipe. Image: DARPA

DARPA says there’s a pressing need to improve robots that can help in natural or man-made disasters. Rather than specialized robotic systems designed for operating in particular situations, the goal of the new program is to develop robots capable of navigating human environments and relying on tools and vehicles designed for people.

“It’s all about adaptability—what’s the most adaptable system that can be used during that first day or two of the disaster when you have a chance to reduce the scope of the disaster by taking action,” Dr. Gill Pratt, the DARPA program manager who’s organizing the challenge, told IEEE Spectrum. “That’s what the challenge is about.” (Read our full interview with Pratt.)

DARPA specifically mentions the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident as an example of a disaster that would have benefited from more capable robots. In fact, the scenario DARPA is planning for the final competition closely resembles the dramatic events that unfolded in the first 24 hours at Fukushima, when human workers attempted but ultimately failed to fix one of the crippled reactors.

Asked if the tasks planned for the challenge—which include using an impact hammer to break through a wall, locating a leaking pipe, and replacing a cooling pump—are a bit too hard, Pratt said “no.” “We think that it’s actually ‘DARPA hard,’ but not an impossible thing to do,” he said. “It’s a goal that has a lot of risk, but a lot of reward as well, and that’s really the theme of what DARPA tries to do.”

DARPA’s previous challenges focused on autonomous vehicles. The competitions are DARPA’s way of spurring innovation by setting up contests that require substantial technological development in a specific field. DARPA wins because it gets lots of very smart people all working at solving a problem, and the rest of us win because these challenges manage to generate tons of progress in a very short amount of time.

The new program seeks to develop not only robotics hardware but also open-source simulation software. Pratt says DARPA is putting a lot of resources into creating a simulator that he hopes will become a “transformational tool” in the field of robotics, promoting innovation and helping to lower the barrier for companies to enter the robotics market. To develop the simulator, he wants to attract not just robotics researchers but also contributors with diverse backgrounds in areas such as computer graphics and video games, adding that there will be financial incentives for various levels of contribution.

IEEE Spectrum got an early look at the Broad Agency Announcement, known as BAA, the solicitation document that DARPA is making public today. Here are the most relevant bits:

• GOAL: The goal of the new program is to “develop ground robotic capabilities to execute complex tasks in dangerous, degraded, human-engineered environments.” Key robotic technologies the program aims to advance include “supervised autonomy, mounted mobility, dismounted mobility, dexterity, strength, and platform endurance.”

• SCHEDULE: The program will consist of two phases, each ending with a competitive challenge. Phase 1 will last 15 months from October 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013. Phase 2 will last 12 months from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. (DARPA says all dates are approximate and subject to change.)

• PRIZE: DARPA is putting up a $2 million cash prize to be awarded to a single team at the end of the second challenge. The incentive for doing well in the first challenge is funding by DARPA for the top scorers to go on to the second challenge. There is no other prize for the first challenge.

• COMPETITORS: The program is open to international teams, and there are no requirements to have ties to a U.S. company or lab. Competitors will be able to enter the challenge via one of the following four distinct tracks: Track A is for teams proposing to develop their own robot and software, and if selected, they’ll receive funding from DARPA. Track B is for teams proposing to develop control software (no hardware) to compete in a computer simulation, and selected teams will be funded by DARPA. Track C is for teams developing, at their own expense, control software (no hardware) to compete in the simulation part of the challenge. Track D is for teams developing, at their own expense, both a robot and software to enter in the competition.

• FUNDING: DARPA plans to select at most five teams for Track A, each receiving up to $3 million in the first phase of the program. For Track B, DARPA will fund up to 12 teams for the first nine months with up to $375,000. After nine months, following a virtual challenge on a government-provided simulator, the agency will select up to six teams (from Tracks B and C), each funded at up to $750,000 and provided a government-funded equipment platform (a robot built by a DARPA contractor). In the second phase, DARPA will select up to eight teams from Tracks A, B, and C, funding each with up to $1 million, with ongoing use of the government-funded robots for the Track B and C teams still in the competition.

• GFE PLATFORM: DARPA will create its own robot—the Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) platform—to allow teams without hardware expertise or hardware capital to participate. The GFE robot is expected to have 7 DOF arms with hands with two or three fingers, 6 DOF legs, and a head with stereo vision and laser radar. Near the middle of Phase 1, a competition using the GFE simulator will determine the highest performing teams from Track B and Track C. A number of such teams will be declared winners and receive GFE robots and funding for continued work. [UPDATE: DARPA has selected Boston Dynamics to build the GFE platform.]

• SIMULATOR: DARPA will also offer an open-source virtual test-bed simulator, which will be “populated with models of robots, robot components, and field environments.” The simulator supplier will manage an open-source effort where the simulator, robot models, and environment models are developed and improved by the supplier as well as by contributors throughout the world. (Details about the simulation effort will be announced later.) [UPDATE: DARPA has selected the Open Source Robotics Foundation to develop the simulation software system.]

Now, the part everyone is curious about: the challenge itself. DARPA says robots will compete with each other performing disaster response operations in a scenario that will likely include the following sequence of events:

1. Drive a utility vehicle at the site
In this event, the robot has to enter the vehicle, drive it on a travel course, and exit the vehicle. The robot has to operate the vehicle controls, including steering, throttle, brakes, and ignition. The vehicle is expected to be an unmodified utility vehicle such as a John Deere Gator or Polaris Ranger.

2. Travel dismounted across rubble
Now the robot has to cross terrain ranging from smooth and level to rough and sloped, with some loose soil and rocks. A human would easily traverse the terrain. In addition, the terrain will include discrete obstacles such as rocks, bushes, trees, and ditches that the robot must avoid.

3. Remove debris blocking an entryway
Here the robot has to move an object blocking an entryway. The object will have size, weight, and other properties to be movable either by a person or by the GFE Platform. The object is expected not to exceed 5 kilograms and be solid like a rock or a cinder block, and may have an irregular shape.

4. Open a door and enter a building
In this event, the robot has to operate a door handle and have the strength to push the door open. The door and door handle are expected to be standard, commercially available items.

5. Climb an industrial ladder and traverse an industrial walkway
The robot has to traverse an industrial elevated walkway (also known as a catwalk) with a grated surface and handrails. As part of this task, the robot has to climb an industrial ladder. It is expected that a person would need to use both arms and legs to climb the ladder.

6. Use a tool to break through a concrete panel
Next the robot has to use a power tool to perform “forceful manipulation.” The power tool will likely be an air or electric impact hammer and chisel, or an electric reciprocating saw. The task is to break through a concrete panel (with no rebar) or through a framed wall. (Pictured above, robot on the right.)

7. Locate and close a valve near a leaking pipe
In this event, the robot has to find a leaking pipe and a nearby valve, which it needs to close. The facility will contain multiple pipes, but only one will be leaking, visible as smoke and audible as the hiss of escaping gas. It is expected that a person would need to use two hands to close the valve. (Pictured above, robot on the left.)

8. Replace a component such as a cooling pump
Finally, the robot has to locate the pump and be able to loosen one or more fasteners to extract the pump from its fittings and reverse all steps to replace the pump. It is expected that the pump will be small and compact enough that a human could handle it with a single hand.

DARPA says these are representative tasks and it “will adjust the difficulty of the scenario as the program progresses, depending on capabilities demonstrated and practical considerations.” The scoring criteria and competition rules have not yet been defined. However, DARPA says that robots that perform more autonomously and consume less energy will score higher.

Last week, details of the new challenge started leaking, appearing on robotics blog Hizook and other sites. But DARPA says the early reports contained errors. In particular, those reports characterized the new program as a humanoids effort, but DARPA says that, although humanoid robots will likely be a big part of the program, the robots don’t have to be humanlike machines. If a team thinks that a giant arachnid robot could perform well, they can enter the competition with that design.

“We don’t want to constrain the design by specifying the geometry or the topology,” Pratt, who led DARPA’s Autonomous Robotic Manipulation (ARM) program, said. “What we want is to constrain the design space by saying what the task is, and we want those tasks to be very representative of what you’d have in a real disaster.”

What’s more, the early reports incorrectly asserted that, because the challenge seems so difficult, teams were not expected to succeed the first time around. This is not the case, Pratt said. “The challenge will be adjusted as we gain experience with the teams over this first phase,” he said. “What we’re going to make sure is that the live challenge is difficult but not impossible.”

But the most exciting thing about this new challenge isn’t the challenge itself. It’s what the challenge is going to do for robotics. If you look at what happened to autonomous vehicles after the DARPA Grand and Urban challenges for vehicles, well, we have autonomous vehicles now. Google’s got piles of them. This is not to say that DARPA gets all the credit for making this happen, but their challenges did prompt (or at least provide an excuse for) massive amounts of focused research that has already paid off with consumer automotive tech that makes driving safer for everyone.

“Some day, not too far from now, we’ll just get into our cars and sit and talk to the person who’s next to us and not worry about how to drive,” Pratt said. “And that would be an amazingly great thing. I expect the same sort of thing will happen with the new challenge we’re launching.”

Posted in Robot News | Leave a comment

Dennis Hong: My seven species of robot

Dennis Hong: My seven species of robot #TED : http://on.ted.com/BOv7

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LEGO gives young engineers a leg up

By Raina Hanna / Special to DeSoto Appeal (Commercial Appeal)
Posted April 4, 2012 at midnight

Cooper Jordan and Ana Le, third-graders in Overpark Elementary School’s Spotlight program, had played with LEGO building kits before but never ones that moved on their own.

But a day of building with LEGO basic motorized kits Tuesday was just the precursor to what the class will experience in the fall when they move up to a classroom set of LEGO Mindstorms.

“Our principal had a company bring in these kits for the day as a reward for the students raising $3,000 to purchase a Mindstorms classroom set that we will have ready to use in the fall,” said teacher Michelle Kinggard.

LEGO Mindstorms allow users to not only build things that move but functioning robots that can respond to light, sound and touch and can be programmed to do a variety of tasks.

The kits the students used Tuesday were part of a program brought into the school by All About Learning Inc. Students were paired up and given the task of building a vehicle capable of challenging vehicles built by their classmates in a battle arena.

Each team was given instructions to construct the vehicle base. Then it was up to the students to decide what weapons, armor and other feature to add. Decisions can be difficult, as students must problem-solve to ensure the vehicle has the ability to both take hits and deal them out.

The first vehicle to lose a LEGO block loses.

“The battle bot kits are kind of an intermediate step, before the Mindstorms,” Kinggard said.

Cooper and Ana set their sights on building a vehicle that would be the most structurally sound.

“I played with LEGOs a lot,” Cooper said. “But these are the first that I’ve used that actually move on their own.”

Often, robotics programs that include materials like LEGO Mindstorms are introduced to students at the middle or high school level. However, Kinggard said more elementary schools are embracing these teaching tools to get students interested in engineering at a young age.

“It’s all a part of STEM — Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics education,” she said. “We already teach science and math, and these kids use technology every day, but it’s harder for them to be exposed to engineering.”

Ana, who wants to be a fashion designer, said activities like these make her reconsider.

“I like building things. I don’t know, I might consider doing something that combines fashion and architecture, maybe even be an architect,” she said.

Cooper hasn’t yet decided on a career path. He said he knows he has plenty of time. For now, he’s more focused on learning everything the school has to offer, especially when it comes to engineering.

“I can’t wait until next year when we build real robots. These are really great, but next year it’ll be so much better,” he said.

Overpark Elementary’s spotlight/gifted program has 78 students. It is co-taught by Kinggard and Allison Hopkins and includes students from second through fifth grade, with each grade having its own class period.

In second grade, the winning battle bot was designed by Gavin Taylor and Dylan Barnette. Third-grade winners were Kristen Oswalt and Rachel Reid. Fourth-grade winners were Joey Miron and Dru Hines. Peyton Thornburg and Ian McGinnes were the winners in the fifth-grade class.

For more information visit their website at allaboutlearning.co.

Posted in Memphis Robotics, Robot News | Leave a comment

National Robotics Week

What are you doing to celebrate http://www.nationalroboticsweek.org/?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Boston Dynamics Jumping Robot

Boston Dynamics Sand Flea Robot Demonstrates Astonishing Jumping Skills
POSTED BY: Evan Ackerman / Wed, March 28, 2012
IEEE Spectrum Online

We’ve been following the development of Boston Dynamics’ Sand Flea jumping robot for years now, but we’ve never actually seen the latest version jump. Now Boston Dynamics has just posted a new video of Sand Flea in action, and this little guy is absolutely bananas.

Sand Flea has its origins in the Precision Urban Hopper, which was born of a collaboration between Sandia National Labs and Boston Dynamics back in 2009. There are some significant differences in the latest version of Sand Flea, some of which we’ve only just seen in this video: for example, instead of jumping while moving (like the Precision Urban Hopper did), Sand Flea stops, rears back, and launches itself into the air:

Sand Flea has no trouble clearing a 10-meter obstacle (about 30 feet), and it’s accurate enough that you can ask it to jump through a window two stories up and it’ll do it. The piston (which looks as if it fires out the back of the robot, as opposed to downwards) is powered by CO2, and Sand Flea can make 25 jumps in a row before it needs to juice itself up again. Sand Flea is intended to be used in Afghanistan to hop over walls, take a look around, and hop right back home again.

The tricky bit to all this (besides, you know, the actual jumping thing) is keeping Sand Flea oriented as steadily as possible during the jump. The idea is that the robot will be able to send back useful video while in midair, which a haphazard aerial tumble would preclude. And it looks like it does a halfway decent job, for sure, but you know what this robot needs? A tail. Seriously. Give it a tail.

Posted in IEEE, Robot News | Leave a comment

Péter Fankhauser: Meet Rezero, the dancing ballbot

Péter Fankhauser: Meet Rezero, the dancing ballbot #TED : http://on.ted.com/BOwj

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

New DARPA Grand Challenge for Humanoid Robots

New DARPA Grand Challenge for Humanoid Robots — Preliminary (Unofficial) Details
April 3, 2012 by Travis Deyle from (Hizook)
New DARPA Humanoid Grand Challenge

It seems we’re going to have a new DARPA Grand Challenge! The BAA with formal details should be out very soon, but for now we’re bringing you the unofficial, preliminary details based on notes from Dr. Gill Pratt’s talk at DTRA Industry Day: The new Grand Challenge is for a humanoid robot (with a bias toward bipedal designs) that can be used in rough terrain and for industrial disasters. The robot will be required to maneuver into and drive an open-frame vehicle (eg. tractor), proceed to a building and dismount, ingress through a locked door using a key, traverse a 100 meter rubble-strewn hallway, climb a ladder, locate a leaking pipe and seal it by closing off a nearby valve, and then replace a faulty pump to resume normal operations — all semi-autonomously with just “supervisory teleoperation.” That’s a tough challenge, but it should be fun! It looks like there will be six hardware teams to develop new robots, and twelve software teams using a common platform (PETMAN anyone?!). The most crazy part about all of this: The United States is getting back into the humanoid robot game… in a big way!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A robot that flies like a bird

A robot that flies like a bird #TED : http://on.ted.com/BOuT

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fifth-grader bests college students at robotics competition

Fifth-grader bests college students at robotics competition
10-year-old’s first-place win earns standing ovation

By Jane Roberts
Commercial Appeal
Posted March 26, 2012 at midnight

Picture taken by Daniel Kohn

Davis Fortenberry, 10, rolled out his robot in a college-level competition in Orlando earlier this month and mopped up, save for the jaws on the floor.

With bangs, barely a care about girls and two feet shorter than the competition, this one-kid team outmaneuvered most college teams at the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Southeastern competition.

“Actually it was kind of exciting; I wasn’t nervous at all,” said Davis, a fifth-grader from Piperton.

“When I explained to them how old I was, what grade I was in and that I did have a robot, I think they were afraid of me,” he said.

Out of 54 teams, only Florida A&M-Florida State University College of Engineering, University of Alabama and Mississippi State scored higher.

“This is a very, very intelligent boy,” said Regina Hannemann, researcher at the University of Kentucky and chairwoman of IEEE District 3 student activities committee.

“A 10-year-old doing this level of programming is astonishing,” she said.

Dan Kohn, assistant professor at the University of Memphis, was struck by Davis’ calm.

“He fit right in, which was just absolutely incredible. I heard him strike up a conversation with a university student. It wasn’t a conversation of a 10-year-old talking to a university student. It was a conversation of equals.”

Earlier, competitors had complained about Davis’ appearance in the contest, sure the boy was showing off someone else’s work.

But when Hannemann announced Davis’ first-place win in the open competition, the room erupted in a standing ovation, the only one all weekend.

“It was as much relief as anything,” Kohn said. “The problem all engineers see is there is such a lag in the United States for science, technology, engineering and math.

“When you see a young man achieving so much at 10 years old, OK, there is hope for us,” he said.

Davis, who has tinkered with robots since he was 5, built his “davibot” in a week, starting with an m3pi (“a robot in itself, really”) as the base.

He added an Arduino (Italian microcomputer that tells the base unit whether to go left, right, straight ahead), then designed components for measuring contest specifics: voltage, capacitance, temperature and waveform.

Contest rules also say robots must be completely autonomous, which means no remote controls or human interaction after competition starts.

“I’m just learning what my dad and brother taught me, and I’m applying it to my work,” Davis said. “So far, it’s been working out.”

He attends Tennessee Virtual Academy, an online school approved by the Tennessee legislature last year.

It allows parents to tailor the home-based curriculum, which turned out to be the critical loophole allowing him to qualify to compete.

“I read over rules thoroughly,” said Davis’ father, Robert Fortenberry, senior vice president of technical services at Cook Systems.

“I could not find anywhere that there was any age limit at all. The requirement was that they have to be an IEEE member.”

Student IEEE membership requires a focus on engineering and computer programming. “They assume that is going to be at the university level,” Fortenberry said.

Their older son, Madison — 19 and a senior at the University of West Florida — also competed as a high school student because he was enrolled in college courses.

Madison was also to compete last weekend. When he got sick the day of the competition, Davis ran his brother’s robot team, plus his own.

“They’re just kids,” Fortenberry said. “We’ve tried to teach them to use their time wisely and exchange it for something valuable. There is nothing more intrinsically valuable than knowledge.”

Posted in IEEE, Memphis Robotics | Leave a comment

Looking for a Robotics Event?

Just found a link to a neat website called robotevents.com/. It has info on all sorts of robotics events and contests. Just thought I would pass it along.

Posted in Robot News | Leave a comment